<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Patching Ruby on Rails Refresher</title>
	<atom:link href="http://accidentaltechnologist.com/ruby/patching-ruby-on-rails-refresher/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://accidentaltechnologist.com/ruby/patching-ruby-on-rails-refresher/</link>
	<description>Musings about Technology, Software Design and Development</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 21:23:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Bazinet</title>
		<link>http://accidentaltechnologist.com/ruby/patching-ruby-on-rails-refresher/#comment-913</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Bazinet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 14:19:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/~rbazinet/?p=373#comment-913</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@Mark - Totally agree, I simply patched production as a way to get the apps fixed up now and not something I would normally do.  The last part of the post mentions patching at the source.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The idea here is how to patch, not necessarily where you should apply the patch.  I have patched my source too but didn&#039;t deploy that way.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Mark &#8211; Totally agree, I simply patched production as a way to get the apps fixed up now and not something I would normally do.  The last part of the post mentions patching at the source.</p>
<p>The idea here is how to patch, not necessarily where you should apply the patch.  I have patched my source too but didn&#8217;t deploy that way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Bazinet</title>
		<link>http://accidentaltechnologist.com/ruby/patching-ruby-on-rails-refresher/#comment-1569</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Bazinet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 14:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/~rbazinet/?p=373#comment-1569</guid>
		<description>@Mark - Totally agree, I simply patched production as a way to get the apps fixed up now and not something I would normally do.  The last part of the post mentions patching at the source.
The idea here is how to patch, not necessarily where you should apply the patch.  I have patched my source too but didn&#039;t deploy that way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Mark &#8211; Totally agree, I simply patched production as a way to get the apps fixed up now and not something I would normally do.  The last part of the post mentions patching at the source.<br />
The idea here is how to patch, not necessarily where you should apply the patch.  I have patched my source too but didn&#8217;t deploy that way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://accidentaltechnologist.com/ruby/patching-ruby-on-rails-refresher/#comment-912</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 14:13:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/~rbazinet/?p=373#comment-912</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Patching is good, but you should be patching your source tree and deploying from there (preferably testing the patch in a staging area first), not patching production directly.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Patching is good, but you should be patching your source tree and deploying from there (preferably testing the patch in a staging area first), not patching production directly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://accidentaltechnologist.com/ruby/patching-ruby-on-rails-refresher/#comment-1568</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 14:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/~rbazinet/?p=373#comment-1568</guid>
		<description>Patching is good, but you should be patching your source tree and deploying from there (preferably testing the patch in a staging area first), not patching production directly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Patching is good, but you should be patching your source tree and deploying from there (preferably testing the patch in a staging area first), not patching production directly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

