<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Observation : Rails Consulting Rates Lower Than .NET Rates</title>
	<atom:link href="http://accidentaltechnologist.com/technology/observation-rails-consulting-rates-lower-than-net-rates/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://accidentaltechnologist.com/technology/observation-rails-consulting-rates-lower-than-net-rates/</link>
	<description>Musings about Technology, Software Design and Development</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 17:59:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean Schofield</title>
		<link>http://accidentaltechnologist.com/technology/observation-rails-consulting-rates-lower-than-net-rates/#comment-677</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Schofield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 21:23:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/~rbazinet/?p=315#comment-677</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;When I was on the job market about 10 months ago I definitely noticed a difference in salary for RoR vs. Java.  I mentioned this at a couple of RoR conferences and people thought I was crazy.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In my experience its true though.  RoR just pays less - but you can&#039;t put a price on happiness.  My guess is this is due to low demand and the fact that in the Washington, D.C. area most jobs are government related contracting (and they&#039;re slow to adopt Rails.)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I was on the job market about 10 months ago I definitely noticed a difference in salary for RoR vs. Java.  I mentioned this at a couple of RoR conferences and people thought I was crazy.</p>
<p>In my experience its true though.  RoR just pays less &#8211; but you can&#8217;t put a price on happiness.  My guess is this is due to low demand and the fact that in the Washington, D.C. area most jobs are government related contracting (and they&#8217;re slow to adopt Rails.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean Schofield</title>
		<link>http://accidentaltechnologist.com/technology/observation-rails-consulting-rates-lower-than-net-rates/#comment-1429</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Schofield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 21:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/~rbazinet/?p=315#comment-1429</guid>
		<description>When I was on the job market about 10 months ago I definitely noticed a difference in salary for RoR vs. Java.  I mentioned this at a couple of RoR conferences and people thought I was crazy.
In my experience its true though.  RoR just pays less - but you can&#039;t put a price on happiness.  My guess is this is due to low demand and the fact that in the Washington, D.C. area most jobs are government related contracting (and they&#039;re slow to adopt Rails.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I was on the job market about 10 months ago I definitely noticed a difference in salary for RoR vs. Java.  I mentioned this at a couple of RoR conferences and people thought I was crazy.<br />
In my experience its true though.  RoR just pays less &#8211; but you can&#8217;t put a price on happiness.  My guess is this is due to low demand and the fact that in the Washington, D.C. area most jobs are government related contracting (and they&#8217;re slow to adopt Rails.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Double Shot #316 &#171; A Fresh Cup</title>
		<link>http://accidentaltechnologist.com/technology/observation-rails-consulting-rates-lower-than-net-rates/#comment-679</link>
		<dc:creator>Double Shot #316 &#171; A Fresh Cup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 07:37:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/~rbazinet/?p=315#comment-679</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;RE: Observation : Rails Consulting Rates Lower Than .NET Rates&lt;/strong&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Pingback from Double Shot #316 &#171; A Fresh Cup&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>RE: Observation : Rails Consulting Rates Lower Than .NET Rates</strong></p>
<p>Pingback from Double Shot #316 &#171; A Fresh Cup</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Double Shot #316 &#171; A Fres</title>
		<link>http://accidentaltechnologist.com/technology/observation-rails-consulting-rates-lower-than-net-rates/#comment-1431</link>
		<dc:creator>Double Shot #316 &#171; A Fres</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 07:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/~rbazinet/?p=315#comment-1431</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;RE: Observation : Rails Consulting Rates Lower Than .NET Rates&lt;/strong&gt;

Pingback from Double Shot #316 &#171; A Fresh Cup</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>RE: Observation : Rails Consulting Rates Lower Than .NET Rates</strong></p>
<p>Pingback from Double Shot #316 &#171; A Fresh Cup</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WebWorkerDaily &#187; Archive Double Shot #316 &#171;</title>
		<link>http://accidentaltechnologist.com/technology/observation-rails-consulting-rates-lower-than-net-rates/#comment-678</link>
		<dc:creator>WebWorkerDaily &#187; Archive Double Shot #316 &#171;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 05:27:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/~rbazinet/?p=315#comment-678</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;RE: Observation : Rails Consulting Rates Lower Than .NET Rates&lt;/strong&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Pingback from WebWorkerDaily &#187; Archive Double Shot #316 &#171;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>RE: Observation : Rails Consulting Rates Lower Than .NET Rates</strong></p>
<p>Pingback from WebWorkerDaily &#187; Archive Double Shot #316 &#171;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WebWorkerDaily &#187; Archive</title>
		<link>http://accidentaltechnologist.com/technology/observation-rails-consulting-rates-lower-than-net-rates/#comment-1430</link>
		<dc:creator>WebWorkerDaily &#187; Archive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 05:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/~rbazinet/?p=315#comment-1430</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;RE: Observation : Rails Consulting Rates Lower Than .NET Rates&lt;/strong&gt;

Pingback from WebWorkerDaily &#187; Archive Double Shot #316 &#171;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>RE: Observation : Rails Consulting Rates Lower Than .NET Rates</strong></p>
<p>Pingback from WebWorkerDaily &#187; Archive Double Shot #316 &#171;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Bazinet</title>
		<link>http://accidentaltechnologist.com/technology/observation-rails-consulting-rates-lower-than-net-rates/#comment-676</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Bazinet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 16:01:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/~rbazinet/?p=315#comment-676</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@Mike - Agreed.  This is just an observation based on my findings in a very limited scope of time.  I did do some searching around some ROR gig sites just to compare and found the rates offered lower than if I went to a .NET gig site with similar requirements for experience.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I know the arguments for Rails is faster to market and does really matter for the rate does it?  Or should the Rails rate be HIGHER than .NET rates because it is faster to market.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;All I can says is..I was surprised...and trying to figure out what this really means.  I figured I could easily provide both types of development, Rails and .NET with interchangeable rates but it looks like that is not the case, at least in my limited experience with finding both types of gigs.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Mike &#8211; Agreed.  This is just an observation based on my findings in a very limited scope of time.  I did do some searching around some ROR gig sites just to compare and found the rates offered lower than if I went to a .NET gig site with similar requirements for experience.</p>
<p>I know the arguments for Rails is faster to market and does really matter for the rate does it?  Or should the Rails rate be HIGHER than .NET rates because it is faster to market.</p>
<p>All I can says is..I was surprised&#8230;and trying to figure out what this really means.  I figured I could easily provide both types of development, Rails and .NET with interchangeable rates but it looks like that is not the case, at least in my limited experience with finding both types of gigs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

