Comments on: Thinking About Google Chrome Frame Deployment http://accidentaltechnologist.com/technology/thinking-about-google-chrome-frame-deployment/ Musings about Technology, Software Design and Development Sun, 22 Jan 2012 21:23:06 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Alex Russell http://accidentaltechnologist.com/technology/thinking-about-google-chrome-frame-deployment/#comment-2170 Alex Russell Wed, 22 Sep 2010 18:49:00 +0000 http://localhost/~rbazinet/?p=374#comment-2170 This post is the first Google result for "Chrome Frame MSI", so I figure I should mention here that MSI packages are available for GCF, including for the new Stable version: http://www.google.com/chromeframe/eula.html?msi=true Using Omaha policy templates, you can also control the update process: http://code.google.com/p/omaha/wiki/UpdateControls Regards This post is the first Google result for “Chrome Frame MSI”, so I figure I should mention here that MSI packages are available for GCF, including for the new Stable version:

http://www.google.com/chromeframe/eula.html?msi=true

Using Omaha policy templates, you can also control the update process:

http://code.google.com/p/omaha/wiki/UpdateControls

Regards

]]> By: JasonFree http://accidentaltechnologist.com/technology/thinking-about-google-chrome-frame-deployment/#comment-914 JasonFree Fri, 09 Oct 2009 08:39:23 +0000 http://localhost/~rbazinet/?p=374#comment-914 <p>The Chrome Frame setup could be very useful...but corporations DEPLOY their software using remote install mechanisms. Those mechanisms vary, but the simple matter of the lack of an MSI with the usual documentation and install options will prevent many users in the corporate world from seeing this add-on.</p> <p>We won't be running out and manually installing this one 20'000 desktops. It just won't get installed unless we have it packaged.</p> <p>JB</p> The Chrome Frame setup could be very useful…but corporations DEPLOY their software using remote install mechanisms. Those mechanisms vary, but the simple matter of the lack of an MSI with the usual documentation and install options will prevent many users in the corporate world from seeing this add-on.

We won’t be running out and manually installing this one 20’000 desktops. It just won’t get installed unless we have it packaged.

JB

]]> By: JasonFree http://accidentaltechnologist.com/technology/thinking-about-google-chrome-frame-deployment/#comment-2011 JasonFree Fri, 09 Oct 2009 08:39:00 +0000 http://localhost/~rbazinet/?p=374#comment-2011 The Chrome Frame setup could be very useful...but corporations DEPLOY their software using remote install mechanisms. Those mechanisms vary, but the simple matter of the lack of an MSI with the usual documentation and install options will prevent many users in the corporate world from seeing this add-on. We won't be running out and manually installing this one 20'000 desktops. It just won't get installed unless we have it packaged. JB The Chrome Frame setup could be very useful…but corporations DEPLOY their software using remote install mechanisms. Those mechanisms vary, but the simple matter of the lack of an MSI with the usual documentation and install options will prevent many users in the corporate world from seeing this add-on.
We won’t be running out and manually installing this one 20’000 desktops. It just won’t get installed unless we have it packaged.
JB

]]>